Samsung Electronics UK Ltd
Samsung House
225 Hook Rise South
Surbiton
Surrey
KT6 7LD
Number of complaints: 5
Date: 26 August 2009
Media: Television, Magazine
Sector: Electrical appliances
Ad
A TV ad and magazine ads, for Samsung televisions.
The voice-over on the TV ad stated Welcome to a whole new world, where Samsung LED technology brings you sharper images, deeper blacks and brighter colours. The ultra slim Samsung LED TV. The next generation of television has arrived. On- Screen text stated Samsung LED TV Next Generation TV.
b. The magazine ads were headlined The Next Generation of TV has arrived and stated Welcome to a whole new world. Where Samsungs revolutionary LED technology redefines all standards of television. Bringing you sharper images, deeper blacks and brighter colours. A stunning, ultra- Slim profile. And design with the environment in mind. Search on Google for LED TV. The logo stated LED TV Next Generation TV.
Issue
Two complainants challenged whether the ads misleadingly implied that the product had an LED (Light Emitting Diode) display, when in fact it just used LEDs for backlighting.
The CAP Code: 7.1
BCAP TV Advertising Code: 5.1.1; 5.1.3
Response
Samsung argued that the discernible difference between LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) and LED (Light-Emitting Diode) TVs was that the LED TV used light emitting diodes as display backlights or edge-lights, rather than cold cathode fluorescent lamps found on most LCD televisions They argued that this light source technology enabled them to improve the colour, design and energy efficiency of the appliance. Samsung said that the phrase LED TV was intended to communicate the type of technology their TVs used in a general way to the consumer and had Used the phrase for their edge-lit TVs since December 2008. although this type of TV was initially referred to as LED-based LCD TV or LED LCD TV they argued that the term had evolved and they were now called LED TVs by consumers and the Industry. Whilst they acknowledged that some informed consumers would be aware of the technological systems used in their product, they believed that this would not be the case for the majority of consumers. Dtion, they stated that the phrase LED TV was widely used to describe the type of TV they sold and sent evidence to show it had been by their competitors and the media and was accepted in the industry. Samsung also argued that the ads made clear That the phrase LED TV meant that their TV used LED technology to improve the colour of the image which clarified the technology of the product to consumers.
Clearcast endorsed the advertisers comments and sent information on how Samsungs LED edge-lighting operated.
Assessment
Upheld
The ASA understood that the Samsung TV had an LCD display with a LED edge-lighting and that it did not have a full LED display. further, we understood that full LED screens were currently only available in certain mediums, such as large outdoor screen displays Witness full LED TVs for household use were in development, they were not yet available in the UK market. We noted Samsungs assertion that the phrase LED TV had evolved and that TVs that used this technology in either back-lighting or edge-lighting had Adopted the phrase to generically describe the technology. However, we noted that there were LCD TVs for sale that used LED technology in their backlighting or edge-lighting, but that they were still described as LED LCD TVs or similar, and that the phrase LED We did that the ad implied the TV displays were included totally of LEDs similar to some outdoor displays when that were not the case. We considered that bec Ause the ads were ambiguous and did not make clear how the TVs utilised the LED technology, the ads were likely to mislead.
The TV ad breached CAP (Broadcast) Code rules 5.1.1 and 5.1.3 (Misleading advertising).
The magazine ads breached CAP Code clause 7.1 (Truthfulness).
Action
The ads must not appear again in their current form. We told Samsung to ensure that future marketing communications described the technology their products used accurately.
iPollo Miner is a supercomputer equipment designer, headquartered in Singapore. The company has evolved as a competitive player on the global market with robust designs since its inception. iPollo`s product line includes not only Ethereum V series, Bitcoin B series, and world-first Grin Asic Miner G series, but also Filecoin, Chia, Swarm, and other Proof of Capacity consensus crypto miners. Aided by iPollo`s rapid growing footprints, the company is eager to serve our institutional and retail clients worldwide with a mission statement of [improving computing power and stability; reducing power consumption and user cost; maintaining blockchain network security."iPollo`s value lies deeply in the supreme quality and prestige reputation amongst our clients and ecosystem. With a strong commitment to continuous exploration and development, iPollo strives to succeed with our clients across the world.
Ipollo Mining Machine:iPollo G1,iPollo V1,iPollo V1 Classic,iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus,iPollo V1 Mini,iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus,iPollo B1L
ipollo miner,ipollo v1,ipollo g1,ipollo mining machine,asic ipollo miner
Shenzhen YLHM Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.ylhm-tech.com